Nature by Ralph Waldo Emerson

 This blog task is assigned by Prakruti Bhatt Ma'am (Department of English, MKBU). Click here to visit the teacher's lesson on TED-Ed.

Q-1: In your opinion, which of the following factors can define an individual's identity/nature: 1) Their Speech 2) Their Behavior 3) Their Choices of Material Possession 4) The things that they hide from everybody. Justify your answer.

In my point of view, an individual's identity is best defined by their behavior and the things they hide from everybody. Speech can be misleading because people often say what is expected of them rather than what they truly believe. Similarly, material possessions do not necessarily reflect one’s true self, as they are often influenced by societal trends and external circumstances.  

I believe that behavior is a strong indicator of identity because actions speak louder than words. How a person treats others, makes decisions, and responds to challenges reveals their true character. A person who consistently acts with integrity, courage, or kindness shows who they really are, regardless of what they say or own.  

Additionally, I think that the things a person hides can reveal their deepest thoughts, fears, and desires. Sometimes, what we choose to conceal reflects our most authentic self—our vulnerabilities, aspirations, and inner struggles. However, I also feel that true self-awareness comes from embracing and understanding these hidden aspects rather than suppressing them.  

Therefore, in my view, a person’s behavior and their hidden truths are the most significant factors in shaping identity, as they reflect the core of who they are beyond external influences.

Q.-2 : Do you agree with Emerson's view that every individual is inherently good? If yes, why? If not, why not?

Ralph Waldo Emerson, as a Transcendentalist, believed in the inherent goodness of individuals, arguing that people are naturally inclined toward truth, virtue, and self-improvement when they follow their intuition and remain connected to nature. He saw society as a corrupting force that stifles individuality and moral clarity.  

Agreement with Emerson:

If one agrees with Emerson, the justification would be:  

- Innate Moral Sense: Humans are born with a conscience that guides them toward goodness, but societal expectations and materialism often distort this purity.  

- Self-Reliance and Growth: Given the right conditions—intellectual freedom and connection with nature—people naturally develop into moral and self-sufficient beings.  

- Examples in History: Figures like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. exemplify how individuals, when true to their inner moral compass, contribute positively to humanity.  

 Disagreement with Emerson:  

On the other hand, one might challenge Emerson’s view because:  

- Complex Human Nature: Thinkers like Thomas Hobbes argued that humans are inherently self-interested and require social structures to maintain order.  

- Historical Evidence: Wars, oppression, and crimes suggest that human nature is not purely good; rather, it contains both altruistic and destructive tendencies.  

- Psychological and Philosophical Views: Freud’s concept of the id and Nietzsche’s perspective on power dynamics indicate that humans struggle with conflicting instincts, not just pure goodness.  

Conclusion:

While Emerson’s optimism about human nature is inspiring, a balanced view acknowledges that individuals possess both good and bad tendencies. The environment, personal choices, and philosophical outlook determine whether one leans toward virtue or vice.

Q.-3: Quote at least one line from the original essay which you found relatable and discuss how it can be relevant in today's time.

"Every end is prospective of some other end, which is also temporary; a round and final success nowhere."

 In my point of view, Ralph Waldo Emerson's observation, "Every end is prospective of some other end, which is also temporary; a round and final success nowhere," highlights the continuous and evolving nature of human pursuits. I find this idea deeply relevant in today’s fast-paced world, where learning and adaptability are key to growth. In my life, I see that no achievement is ever truly final; rather, each success serves as a foundation for the next challenge. Whether in academics, career, or personal development, I believe that embracing this mindset fosters resilience and a willingness to explore new opportunities. The transient nature of success, in my opinion, is what drives progress, encouraging individuals to remain open to innovation, self-improvement, and lifelong learning.

Reference :

Emerson, Ralph Waldo. Essays, by Ralph Waldo Emerson. Project Gutenberg, 2005, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/16643/16643-h/16643-h.htm