Assignment: Paper 207:Contemporary Literatures in English

Topic: Climate Crisis, Digital Connectivity, and Global Uncertainty: Reading Gun Island in the Age of Networked Catastrophe

Personal Information :

Name:- Parthiv Solanki 

Batch:- M.A. Sem 4 (2024-2026)

Enrollment Number:- 5108240032

E-mail:- parthivsolanki731@gmail.com 

Assignment Details:-

Topic: Climate Crisis, Digital Connectivity, and Global Uncertainty: Reading Gun Island in the Age of Networked Catastrophe.

Paper:- 207:Contemporary Literatures in English

Submitted to: Smt. Sujata Binoy Gardi, Department of English, MKBU, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India.

Date of Submission: March 30, 2026

Table of Contents : 

• Abstract
• Keywords
• Introduction 
• Conceptual Framework: Climate Crisis and Networked Catastrophe
• Globalization and Transnational Climate Realities
• Digital Connectivity and Mediation of Experience
• Simultaneity of Disasters in a Networked World
• Migration and Climate-Induced Displacement
• Collapse of Temporal and Spatial Boundaries
• Myth, Technology, and Epistemic Uncertainty
• Fragility of Global Systems and Infrastructures
• Posthumanism and the De-centering of Human Agency
• Psychological Impact: Anxiety, Fear, and Uncertainty
• Narrative Form and Fragmentation in Contemporary Fiction
• Conclusion 
• References

Abstract

This paper examines Gun Island as a critical literary response to the contemporary condition of “networked catastrophe,” where climate crisis, digital connectivity, and global uncertainty converge. The study argues that Amitav Ghosh reconfigures the traditional novel form to capture the simultaneity and interconnectedness of ecological disasters in the Anthropocene era. By situating events across diverse geographies such as the Sundarbans, Venice, and Los Angeles, the narrative foregrounds the transnational nature of climate change and its entanglement with migration and globalization. Furthermore, the paper explores how digital technologies mediate human perception of reality, producing fragmented knowledge and epistemic instability. The novel’s integration of myth particularly the figure of Manasa Devi within a technologically saturated world challenges Enlightenment rationality and underscores the persistence of alternative ways of knowing. Through its nonlinear structure and polyphonic narrative, Gun Island reflects the disorientation and anxiety characteristic of contemporary global life. Ultimately, the study contends that the novel not only represents climate crisis but also reimagines literature’s role in addressing ecological and cultural disruptions in an increasingly interconnected yet unstable world.

Keywords:

Climate Crisis, Networked Catastrophe, Digital Connectivity, Anthropocene, Ecocriticism, Migration,Globalization, Myth and Modernity

1. Introduction

In the twenty-first century, the world is increasingly defined by overlapping crises—climate change, mass migration, and digital hyper-connectivity—which together produce a condition of global uncertainty. Literature has begun to respond to this complex reality by evolving new narrative strategies capable of representing large-scale ecological disruptions. In this context, Amitav Ghosh’s Gun Island emerges as a significant intervention that reimagines the scope and function of the contemporary novel.

The novel traverses multiple geographies, from the fragile ecosystem of the Sundarbans to the historical cityscape of Venice and the wildfire-prone regions of Los Angeles, thereby foregrounding the transnational nature of climate change. At the same time, it captures how digital technologies mediate human understanding of these crises, creating a fragmented yet interconnected experience of reality. By blending myth, history, and contemporary events, Ghosh constructs a narrative that reflects the instability and unpredictability of the modern world. Thus, Gun Island can be read not merely as a story of environmental change but as a broader commentary on the condition of living in an age of “networked catastrophe,” where ecological, technological, and social systems intersect in unprecedented ways.

2. Conceptual Framework: Climate Crisis and Networked Catastrophe

The concept of “networked catastrophe” provides a useful framework for understanding the complex dynamics represented in Gun Island. Unlike earlier forms of crisis that were localized and temporally contained, contemporary climate disasters are interconnected across regions and systems. Cyclones in South Asia, floods in Europe, and wildfires in North America are no longer isolated events but part of a global ecological network shaped by human activity in the Anthropocene. In Gun Island, climate change is depicted as a force that transcends national boundaries, linking distant geographies through shared vulnerability. This interconnectedness is further intensified by global communication networks that allow information about disasters to circulate instantaneously. 

As a result, catastrophe is experienced not only physically but also virtually, creating a continuous awareness of global crisis. Moreover, the novel challenges the traditional separation between nature and culture by showing how human actions—industrialization, urbanization, and ecological exploitation—are deeply entangled with environmental transformations. The idea of networked catastrophe thus emphasizes that climate change is not merely a natural phenomenon but a complex system involving social, economic, and technological factors.

3. Globalization and Transnational Climate Realities

One of the central concerns of Gun Island is the role of globalization in shaping contemporary climate realities. The novel illustrates how global economic systems contribute to environmental degradation while simultaneously facilitating transnational movement and cultural exchange. The journeys undertaken by the characters—from India to Europe—reflect the interconnected nature of the modern world, where boundaries between nations are increasingly porous.

At the same time, globalization exposes deep inequalities in the distribution of climate risk. Vulnerable regions such as the Sundarbans are disproportionately affected by rising sea levels and extreme weather events, forcing inhabitants to migrate in search of survival. This migration is not merely a personal or economic choice but a consequence of ecological displacement, highlighting the emergence of climate refugees in the twenty-first century.

Through its transnational narrative, Gun Island demonstrates that climate change cannot be understood within the confines of a single nation or culture. Instead, it requires a global perspective that recognizes the interconnectedness of environmental, economic, and social systems. In doing so, the novel critiques the structures of globalization that both enable and exacerbate ecological crises.

4. Digital Connectivity and Mediation of Experience

In addition to its focus on climate change and globalization, Gun Island explores the role of digital technology in shaping contemporary experience. The novel portrays a world in which individuals rely on smartphones, emails, and online platforms to access information and communicate across distances. This digital connectivity creates a sense of immediacy, allowing characters to remain constantly aware of events occurring in different parts of the world. However, this mediated form of experience also introduces new forms of uncertainty and fragmentation. Information is often incomplete, contradictory, or overwhelming, making it difficult to distinguish between reality and perception. As a result, knowledge in the digital age becomes unstable, contributing to a sense of disorientation and anxiety.

Furthermore, digital technology transforms the way stories are told and understood. The narrative of Gun Island itself reflects this transformation through its fragmented structure and multiple perspectives, mirroring the discontinuous flow of information in contemporary life. By foregrounding the role of digital mediation, the novel highlights how technology not only connects the world but also complicates our understanding of it.

5. Simultaneity of Disasters in a Networked World

One of the most compelling narrative strategies employed by Amitav Ghosh in Gun Island is the representation of disasters as simultaneous, interconnected phenomena unfolding across the globe. Traditionally, literary narratives have approached catastrophe as a localized and temporally bounded event—an earthquake in one region, a flood in another—each treated as discrete and self-contained. However, Gun Island disrupts this paradigm by presenting environmental crises as part of a vast, interlinked system characteristic of the Anthropocene, where human activity has altered planetary processes.

In the novel, cyclonic disturbances in the Sundarbans, flooding in Venice, and wildfires in Los Angeles are not merely coincidental occurrences; they are structurally linked through climatic transformations driven by global warming. This simultaneity reflects the scientific reality that climate systems operate on a planetary scale, where disturbances in one region can influence conditions elsewhere. Ghosh’s narrative thus mirrors the interconnectedness of Earth systems, transforming the novel into a literary analogue of ecological networks.

This sense of simultaneity is further intensified by digital connectivity. In a world saturated with information technologies, characters encounter these disasters not only through direct experience but also through mediated forms such as news reports, social media updates, and instant communication. The result is a collapse of temporal distance: events occurring thousands of miles away are experienced in real time. This produces what may be termed a “perpetual present of crisis,” in which catastrophe is no longer an exceptional event but an ongoing condition of existence.

Moreover, this continuous exposure to global disasters fosters a heightened sense of vulnerability and anxiety. The characters are constantly reminded that no place is immune from ecological disruption, reinforcing the idea of a shared planetary fate. The simultaneity of disasters thus becomes a defining feature of what can be described as a “networked catastrophe,” where ecological events are interconnected not only through natural systems but also through technological networks that disseminate information instantaneously.

At a deeper level, this narrative strategy challenges anthropocentric assumptions about control and predictability. The inability of human systems—scientific, political, or technological—to fully comprehend or manage these interconnected disasters underscores the limits of human agency in the face of complex ecological processes. In this sense, Gun Island presents a world in which catastrophe is both ubiquitous and uncontrollable, reflecting the precarious condition of life in the Anthropocene.

6. Migration and Climate-Induced Displacement

Migration in Gun Island is not merely a socio-economic phenomenon but a deeply ecological one, shaped by the forces of climate change and environmental degradation. Amitav Ghosh foregrounds the experiences of individuals and communities whose lives are disrupted by rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and the gradual erosion of habitable landscapes. The Sundarbans, a region already marked by ecological fragility, serves as a powerful site for exploring the human consequences of climate change.

The novel portrays migration as both a necessity and a risk, as individuals are compelled to leave their homes in search of survival. This movement is often fraught with danger, involving perilous journeys across borders and oceans, as well as encounters with exploitation and marginalization. The experiences of migrants in the novel highlight the precarious nature of displacement, where survival is contingent upon navigating complex and often hostile environments.

Importantly, Gun Island challenges conventional distinctions between voluntary and forced migration. While some characters appear to move in search of better opportunities, their decisions are deeply influenced by environmental pressures that limit their choices. Climate change thus emerges as a structural force that compels migration, blurring the boundaries between agency and compulsion. The concept of the “climate refugee,” though not formally recognized in many legal frameworks, becomes central to understanding these experiences.

The novel also situates migration within the broader context of globalization. The routes taken by migrants—from South Asia to Europe—reflect the interconnected networks of labor, trade, and communication that define the contemporary world. These transnational movements reveal the uneven distribution of resources and opportunities, as well as the stark inequalities that characterize global systems. Those who contribute least to environmental degradation are often the ones most severely affected by its consequences.

Furthermore, Ghosh’s portrayal of migration emphasizes the cultural and psychological dimensions of displacement. Migrants are not only uprooted from their physical environments but also from their social and cultural contexts, leading to a sense of dislocation and loss. At the same time, their journeys create new forms of cultural interaction and exchange, highlighting the dynamic and transformative nature of migration. Through its nuanced depiction of climate-induced displacement, Gun Island offers a critical commentary on the inadequacies of existing political and legal frameworks in addressing the realities of the Anthropocene. It calls for a rethinking of concepts such as citizenship, belonging, and responsibility in a world where environmental crises transcend national boundaries.

7. Collapse of Temporal and Spatial Boundaries

A defining characteristic of Gun Island is its disruption of conventional notions of time and space, reflecting the fragmented and accelerated nature of contemporary life. Amitav Ghosh constructs a narrative that moves fluidly across geographical locations and historical periods, creating a sense of temporal and spatial disorientation. This narrative strategy mirrors the effects of globalization and digital connectivity, which compress distances and blur distinctions between past and present.

The novel challenges linear conceptions of time by interweaving historical narratives with contemporary events. The legend of the Gun Merchant, rooted in pre-modern history, continues to resonate in the present, suggesting that the past is not a distant or completed entity but an active force shaping current realities. This temporal layering creates a sense of continuity and recurrence, where patterns of migration, trade, and ecological interaction repeat across time.

At the same time, the narrative reflects the acceleration of time characteristic of the digital age. Information travels instantaneously, and events unfold at a rapid pace, creating a sense of urgency and immediacy. This compression of time contributes to a feeling of instability, as the boundaries between different temporal moments become increasingly blurred.

Spatially, the novel constructs a transnational landscape that resists fixed geographical boundaries. The movement between the Sundarbans, Venice, and other locations highlights the interconnectedness of different regions, emphasizing that local events are embedded within global systems. These spaces are linked not only through physical travel but also through ecological and cultural connections, forming a complex network of relationships.

The collapse of temporal and spatial boundaries in Gun Island thus reflects a broader transformation in the way we experience the world. It challenges traditional frameworks of understanding that rely on stable categories of time and space, offering instead a vision of reality as fluid, interconnected, and constantly in flux. This narrative approach is particularly suited to representing the complexities of the Anthropocene, where environmental, social, and technological processes operate across multiple scales simultaneously.

8. Myth, Technology, and Epistemic Uncertainty

One of the most intellectually provocative aspects of Gun Island is its exploration of the relationship between myth and modern technology, and the resulting condition of epistemic uncertainty. Amitav Ghosh juxtaposes scientific rationality with mythological narratives, particularly the figure of Manasa Devi, the serpent goddess associated with protection and ecological balance. Rather than relegating myth to the realm of superstition, the novel reactivates it as a meaningful mode of understanding the world.

In the context of the Anthropocene, where scientific knowledge often proves insufficient to fully explain or predict ecological phenomena, myth offers an alternative framework for interpreting reality. The presence of Manasa Devi in the narrative suggests that non-human forces possess agency and significance, challenging the anthropocentric assumptions of modern thought. Myth, in this sense, becomes a way of acknowledging the limits of human knowledge and the complexity of ecological systems.

At the same time, the novel portrays a world deeply embedded in digital technology, where information is accessed and disseminated through electronic networks. While these technologies provide unprecedented access to knowledge, they also contribute to fragmentation and uncertainty. Information is often partial, contradictory, or overwhelming, making it difficult to establish coherent narratives or reliable truths.

The coexistence of myth and digital knowledge creates a hybrid epistemological landscape in which multiple modes of understanding intersect and compete. Characters must navigate this complex terrain, interpreting events that cannot be easily explained within a single framework. This produces a sense of epistemic uncertainty, where certainty is elusive and knowledge is constantly contested.

Furthermore, this tension between myth and technology challenges Enlightenment ideals of rationality and progress. The novel suggests that modernity’s emphasis on scientific knowledge and technological advancement has not eliminated uncertainty but has, in some ways, intensified it. By integrating myth into a contemporary setting, Gun Island calls for a more pluralistic approach to knowledge, one that recognizes the value of diverse perspectives and ways of knowing.

Ultimately, the interplay between myth, technology, and uncertainty in Gun Island reflects the broader challenges of understanding and responding to climate change. It highlights the need for new epistemological frameworks that can accommodate the complexity and unpredictability of the Anthropocene, moving beyond the limitations of traditional modes of thought.

9. Fragility of Global Systems and Infrastructures

A crucial dimension of Gun Island lies in its exposure of the fragility underlying contemporary global systems and infrastructures. In an age often characterized by technological advancement, economic integration, and seamless mobility, Amitav Ghosh reveals the extent to which these systems are precariously balanced and deeply vulnerable to ecological disruption. The novel challenges the dominant narrative of globalization as a stable and progressive force by foregrounding its susceptibility to breakdown under the pressure of climate change.

Modern infrastructures—transport networks, communication systems, and urban environments—are typically perceived as symbols of human mastery over nature. However, Gun Island demonstrates that these systems are not autonomous or invulnerable; rather, they are intricately dependent on ecological conditions. The flooding of Venice, for instance, disrupts not only daily life but also the economic and cultural systems that sustain the city. Similarly, wildfires in technologically advanced regions such as Los Angeles expose the limitations of modern infrastructure in the face of extreme environmental events.

This vulnerability is further amplified by the interconnected nature of global systems. In a networked world, disruptions in one region can have cascading effects across multiple domains. Supply chains, migration routes, and communication networks are all susceptible to interruption, revealing the systemic risks embedded within globalization. The novel thus portrays a world in which stability is an illusion, sustained only under favorable ecological conditions that are increasingly under threat.

Moreover, Ghosh highlights the uneven distribution of infrastructural resilience. While some regions possess the resources to mitigate or recover from environmental disasters, others—particularly in the Global South—are left exposed to their full impact. This disparity underscores the role of historical and economic inequalities in shaping the consequences of climate change. The fragility of global systems is therefore not merely a technical issue but also a political and ethical one, raising questions about responsibility, justice, and sustainability.

At a deeper level, the novel suggests that the very logic of globalization—based on continuous growth, resource extraction, and mobility—is fundamentally incompatible with ecological limits. The breakdown of infrastructures in Gun Island can thus be read as symptomatic of a larger systemic crisis, in which the assumptions underpinning modern civilization are called into question. By exposing the fragility of global systems, Ghosh invites readers to reconsider the sustainability of contemporary modes of living and to imagine alternative futures grounded in ecological balance.

10. Posthumanism and the De-centering of Human Agency

Gun Island engages profoundly with posthumanist thought by challenging the centrality of the human subject and foregrounding the agency of non-human forces. In contrast to traditional humanist perspectives that place humans at the center of meaning and control, Amitav Ghosh constructs a narrative in which human agency is decentered, and the boundaries between human and non-human are destabilized.

The novel repeatedly emphasizes the active role of non-human entities—animals, weather systems, and ecological processes—in shaping events. Creatures such as snakes, dolphins, and spiders are not merely symbolic or decorative; they function as agents that influence the trajectory of the narrative. Similarly, natural phenomena such as storms, tides, and wildfires are depicted as dynamic forces that resist human control and prediction. This emphasis on non-human agency aligns with posthumanist and new materialist frameworks, which seek to move beyond anthropocentric modes of thought.

The figure of Manasa Devi further complicates the distinction between human and non-human agency. As a mythological embodiment of ecological power, she represents the interconnectedness of all life forms and the limits of human authority over nature. Her presence in the narrative suggests that the forces governing the world cannot be fully understood or controlled through rational or scientific means alone. In this sense, myth becomes a vehicle for articulating a posthumanist vision of the world, in which humans are but one component of a larger ecological network.

Importantly, the novel does not simply diminish human agency but reconfigures it. Humans are still capable of action and decision-making, but their agency is shown to be contingent upon and constrained by non-human forces. This shift in perspective challenges the Enlightenment ideal of the autonomous, rational subject and calls for a more relational understanding of existence. Human actions are embedded within a web of ecological interactions, where outcomes are shaped by a multitude of factors beyond human control.

Furthermore, the decentering of the human has ethical implications. By recognizing the agency of non-human entities, Gun Island encourages a more inclusive and responsible approach to the environment. It calls for a rethinking of human relationships with the natural world, moving away from domination and exploitation toward coexistence and mutual respect. In this way, the novel contributes to a broader reorientation of thought in the Anthropocene, where the survival of the planet depends on acknowledging and responding to the interconnectedness of all forms of life.

11. Psychological Impact: Anxiety, Fear, and Uncertainty

Beyond its thematic engagement with climate change and globalization, Gun Island offers a profound exploration of the psychological effects of living in an age of continuous crisis. Amitav Ghosh captures the pervasive sense of anxiety, fear, and uncertainty that characterizes contemporary existence, particularly in the context of ecological instability and global interconnectedness. The constant exposure to environmental disasters—whether experienced directly or mediated through digital technologies—creates a condition of heightened awareness and vulnerability. Characters in the novel are not isolated from these events; rather, they are continuously confronted with images and information about crises occurring across the world. This produces a sense of what may be termed “global anxiety,” where the boundaries between personal and collective experience become blurred.

Fear in the novel is not limited to immediate physical danger but extends to a more diffuse and existential level. The unpredictability of climate change, the instability of global systems, and the erosion of familiar structures contribute to a pervasive sense of insecurity. Characters grapple with the realization that the future is uncertain and that the frameworks they rely on to make sense of the world are increasingly inadequate.

Uncertainty also manifests at the level of knowledge and perception. As discussed earlier, the coexistence of myth, science, and digital information creates an epistemological landscape in which certainty is elusive. Characters must navigate conflicting explanations and incomplete data, leading to a sense of disorientation. This epistemic uncertainty reinforces psychological instability, as individuals struggle to interpret and respond to the events unfolding around them.

Moreover, the experience of migration and displacement intensifies these psychological effects. Migrants in the novel face not only physical hardship but also emotional and cultural dislocation. The loss of home, community, and identity contributes to feelings of alienation and vulnerability. At the same time, the precarious conditions of their journeys heighten their sense of fear and insecurity. Despite this pervasive atmosphere of anxiety, Gun Island also gestures toward the possibility of resilience and adaptation. The characters’ efforts to understand and respond to their circumstances suggest that uncertainty, while unsettling, can also be a catalyst for reflection and transformation. The novel thus presents a nuanced portrayal of psychological experience in the Anthropocene, acknowledging both the challenges and the potential for new forms of awareness and engagement.

12. Narrative Form and Fragmentation in Contemporary Fiction

One of the most distinctive aspects of Gun Island is its innovative narrative form, which reflects the fragmented and disjointed realities of the contemporary world. Amitav Ghosh departs from the conventions of linear storytelling and instead constructs a narrative that is fluid, multi-layered, and polyphonic. This formal experimentation is not merely stylistic but deeply connected to the thematic concerns of the novel, particularly the representation of climate crisis, globalization, and digital interconnectedness.

The structure of Gun Island is characterized by shifts in geography, time, and perspective, creating a sense of narrative discontinuity. The story moves across diverse locations such as the Sundarbans, Venice, and Los Angeles, often without clear transitions, mirroring the way information flows in the digital age. This spatial fragmentation reflects the interconnected yet disjointed nature of global reality, where events in distant regions are linked but not seamlessly integrated.

Temporal fragmentation is another key feature of the novel. The narrative oscillates between past and present, weaving together historical legends with contemporary events. The myth of the Gun Merchant operates alongside modern experiences, creating a layered temporality that challenges linear conceptions of time. This disruption of chronological order reflects the collapse of temporal boundaries discussed earlier, emphasizing the simultaneity and recurrence of events in the Anthropocene. Furthermore, the novel incorporates multiple modes of narration, including personal recollection, historical documentation, and digital communication. Emails, messages, and conversations form an integral part of the narrative fabric, highlighting the role of technology in shaping storytelling. 

This multiplicity of voices and forms contributes to a polyphonic structure, where no single perspective dominates. Instead, meaning emerges through the interaction of diverse viewpoints. Fragmentation in Gun Island also reflects epistemic uncertainty. The lack of a unified narrative perspective mirrors the difficulty of constructing coherent explanations in a world marked by complex and overlapping crises. The reader is required to piece together disparate fragments of information, much like the characters themselves, creating an active and participatory reading experience.

At a broader level, Ghosh’s narrative strategy can be seen as a response to the challenges of representing climate change within the framework of the novel. Traditional realist forms, with their focus on individual experience and linear causality, are often inadequate for capturing the scale and complexity of ecological crises. By adopting a fragmented and non-linear structure, Gun Island expands the possibilities of the novel form, making it capable of engaging with the realities of the contemporary world. Thus, the narrative form of Gun Island is not merely a reflection of fragmentation but an attempt to reconfigure literary representation itself, aligning it with the conditions of a networked, unstable, and interconnected global reality.

Conclusion

Gun Island stands as a powerful literary exploration of the contemporary condition, where climate crisis, digital connectivity, and global uncertainty converge to reshape human experience. Through its transnational narrative, Amitav Ghosh presents a world in which ecological, social, and technological systems are deeply intertwined, producing a state of “networked catastrophe” that defies conventional modes of understanding.

The novel’s depiction of simultaneous disasters across different regions highlights the planetary scale of climate change, while its focus on migration underscores the human consequences of environmental disruption. By exposing the fragility of global infrastructures and the inequalities embedded within them, Gun Island offers a critical perspective on the limitations of globalization. At the same time, its engagement with posthumanist ideas challenges anthropocentric assumptions, emphasizing the agency of non-human forces and the interconnectedness of all forms of life.

The psychological dimensions of the novel further deepen its exploration of contemporary reality, capturing the pervasive sense of anxiety, fear, and uncertainty that accompanies life in the Anthropocene. This emotional landscape is reinforced by the novel’s fragmented narrative form, which mirrors the disjointed and mediated nature of modern experience. The integration of myth and technology adds another layer of complexity, suggesting that new ways of knowing are required to navigate the uncertainties of the present.

Ultimately, Gun Island is not merely a representation of crisis but a reimagining of the role of literature in an age of global instability. It demonstrates that the novel can serve as a vital space for engaging with ecological and cultural challenges, offering insights that extend beyond the limits of scientific and political discourse. In doing so, Ghosh redefines the possibilities of contemporary fiction, positioning it as a crucial medium for understanding and responding to the complexities of the modern world.

Words : 4,318

Images: 1

References 

• Ghosh, Amitav. Gun Island. Penguin Random House India, 2019.
• Ghosh, Amitav. The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. University of Chicago Press, 2016.
• Heise, Ursula K. Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global. Oxford University Press, 2008.
• Morton, Timothy. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. University of Minnesota Press, 2013.
• Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 35, no. 2, 2009, pp. 197–222.
• Braidotti, Rosi. The Posthuman. Polity Press, 2013.