This blog is written as a task assigned by the head of the Department of English (MKBU), Prof. Dilip Barad Sir. Here is the link to the professor's blogs for background reading:Click here to learn more about Derrida and Deconstruction / click here to read more about the Flipped Learning Network.
Jacques Derrida: A Brief Overview
Full Name: Jacques Derrida
Born: July 15, 1930 – El Biar, French Algeria
Died: October 8, 2004 – Paris, France
Nationality: French
Main Interests: Philosophy of language, literature, ethics, politics, metaphysics
Famous for: Founding Deconstruction
Jacques Derrida was a French philosopher and literary theorist, best known for developing the critical theory known as deconstruction. His work has had a profound influence on philosophy, literary theory, linguistics, postcolonial studies, gender studies, and cultural theory.
What is Flipped Learning?
Flipped learning is a student-centered teaching approach where content delivery happens outside the classroom via videos, readings, or online lectures and classroom time is used for active learning like discussion, problem-solving, and collaboration Students learn basic concepts at home, freeing class time for deeper engagement.
- Emphasizes active learning and higher-order thinking (analysis, evaluation, creation).
- Based on constructivist principles students construct knowledge through participation.
- Shifts teacher role from “sage on the stage” to “guide on the side.”
- Supports differentiated instruction and peer learning.
- Technology plays a vital role by making content accessible anytime, anywhere.
- Encourages critical thinking, independence, and lifelong learning.
In essence, flipped learning transforms passive classrooms into interactive learning environments focused on student engagement and mastery
1. Video 1: Defining Deconstruction
Q:1 Why is it difficult to define Deconstruction?
Because Derrida believes that defining any concept rigidly creates boundaries and hides its inherent contradictions; deconstruction exposes these hidden tensions, making stable definitions inherently unreliable.
1.2. • Is Deconstruction a negative term?
No, Deconstruction is not a negative term.
Derrida clarifies that it is not about destruction but a critical inquiry into the conditions that create and limit meaning. It examines structures without aiming to tear them down, instead revealing their internal contradictions to transform our understanding.
1.3. • How does Deconstruction happen on its own?
Deconstruction happens on its own because the very structures that create meaning like binary oppositions contain internal contradictions. According to Derrida, these contradictions eventually destabilize the system from within, causing it to unravel without external force.
Question :
In what ways does the tension between différance and the archive challenge the translatability of deconstructive thought across cultural-linguistic contexts, and how does this tension reinforce Derrida's claim that systems are inherently self-deconstructing?
2. Video 2: Heidegger and Derrida
2.1. • The influence of Heidegger on Derrida
Heidegger influenced Derrida by inspiring the idea of questioning philosophical foundations. Derrida adapted Heidegger’s Destruktion into Deconstruction, focusing on how meaning in language is unstable and self-contradictory.
2.2. • Derridean rethinking of the foundations of Western philosophy
Derrida rethinks the foundations of Western philosophy by challenging its reliance on binary oppositions (like presence/absence) and the idea of a fixed center of meaning. Through deconstruction, he reveals that philosophical systems are built on unstable assumptions and hidden hierarchies, making meaning always deferred and never absolute.
Question:
How does Derrida’s notion of Différance problematize Heidegger’s destruktion when both gesture toward a dismantling of metaphysics, yet differ in their treatment of writing, speech, and the trace?
3. Video 3: Saussurean and Derrida
3.1. • Ferdinand de Saussureian concept of language (that meaning is arbitrary, relational, constitutive)
Ferdinand de Saussure argued that meaning in language is arbitrary, relational, and constitutive. The relationship between a word (signifier) and its meaning (signified) is not natural but conventional, and meanings are produced relationally words gain meaning not by reference to things, but by differences from other words in the system.
3.2. • How Derrida deconstructs the idea of arbitrariness?
Derrida accepts Saussure's idea that meaning is arbitrary but pushes further, arguing that meaning is endlessly deferred and never fully present. Through his concept of différance, he shows that language does not just lack natural grounding it cannot provide stable meaning at all, since each signifier leads to another in an infinite chain.
3.3. • Concept of metaphysics of presence
The metaphysics of presence refers to the Western philosophical tendency to privilege presence over absence, speech over writing, and immediacy over deferral. Derrida critiques this, arguing that philosophy falsely assumes meaning is immediately accessible, when in fact meaning is always constructed through absence, difference, and deferral.
Question:
How does Derrida’s concept of différance build on yet destabilize Saussure’s relational theory of language, while also uncovering the implicit metaphysics of presence embedded within structuralist thought?
4. Video 4: DifferAnce
4.1. • Derridean concept of Differance
Différance is Derrida’s coined term combining “to differ” and “to defer.” It signifies that meaning in language arises through differences between signs and is always postponed, never fully present or complete. It challenges the idea of fixed meaning and reveals the instability of linguistic structures
4.2. • Infinite play of meaning
Derrida argues that language is a system of signs where one word leads to another endlessly, creating an infinite play of meaning. Since there is no final or absolute signified, meaning is never fixed—it is always shifting, deferred, and dependent on context.
4.3. • Différance = to differ + to defer.
The term différance combines:
To differ: meaning arises through the difference between signs.
To defer: meaning is postponed, never fully present at any moment.
Together, this shows that meaning is both unstable and always in motion.
Question :
How does Derrida’s conception of différance as both the force that defers meaning and differentiates signs undermine the metaphysics of presence without reintroducing a covert telos or transcendental signified within the very play it seeks to disrupt?
5. Video 5: Structure, Sign, and Play
5.1. • Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences
This is Derrida’s 1966 lecture that marks the birth of poststructuralism. He critiques structuralism for assuming a fixed center in systems (like language or culture) that provides stability. Derrida argues that this "center" is an illusion, and meaning is always shifting—what he calls “free play”. The essay deconstructs the idea of stable structures and introduces the rupture where structure becomes unstable, opening up endless interpretations.
5.2. • Explain: "Language bears within itself the necessity of its own critique."
This means that language cannot be used without also being questioned, because any attempt to define, explain, or critique something through language is already caught in its limits, ambiguities, and contradictions. Since meaning in language is unstable and deferred (as shown by Derrida), any critique made through language must also turn back on itself, exposing its own blind spots and assumptions.
Question:
How does Derrida’s “Structure, Sign and Play” challenge the foundational assumptions of structuralism, and in what way does the idea that “language bears within itself the necessity of its own critique” reflect the deconstructive turn in philosophy and literary theory?
6. Video 6: Yale School
6.1. • The Yale School: the hub of the practitioners of Deconstruction in the literary theories
The Yale School refers to a group of American literary critics—Paul de Man, J. Hillis Miller, Harold Bloom, and Geoffrey Hartman—based at Yale University, who were instrumental in introducing and popularizing Jacques Derrida’s Deconstruction in literary studies. They applied Derrida’s philosophical insights to literary texts, reshaping critical theory in the American academy during the 1970s and 1980s.
6.2. • The characteristics of the Yale School of Deconstruction
Focus on figurative language and rhetoric.
Belief in the instability of meaning in texts.
Critique of traditional literary methods (formalist/historicist).
Interest in Romanticism and postmodern themes.
Question:
How does the Yale School’s insistence on language’s figurative opacity reconcile with Derrida’s claim that deconstruction itself cannot escape its own linguistic conditions, creating a perpetual loop of critique and self-critique?
7. Video 7: Other Schools and Deconstruction
7.1. How did other schools like New Historicism, Cultural Materialism, Feminism, Marxism, and Postcolonial theorists use deconstruction?
Deconstruction helped critical theories like Feminism, Marxism, and Postcolonialism expose hidden power structures, binary oppositions, and ideological biases in texts. It enabled them to challenge fixed meanings and dominant narratives.
Question:
In what ways does Derrida’s theory of deconstruction enable critical theories like Feminism and Postcolonialism to question the authority of Western metaphysical thought and promote marginal voices?
.png)
.png)
.png)