Movie Screening: Chanya Button's Vita & Virginia

This blog is a pre-reading task for Virginia Woolf's Orlando provided by Prakruti Bhatt Ma'am.

1) How do the letters function not only as a medium of communication between the two central characters but also as narrative tool within the film?

In Sally Potter’s film 'Orlando', letters serve as a vital medium of communication between the central characters, encapsulating their emotions, desires, and evolving relationships. The letters exchanged between Orlando and Sasha capture the fleeting intensity of their romance, while those with Shelmerdine reflect a more mature and egalitarian bond. Through these written exchanges, the letters transcend time and gender, mirroring Orlando’s own fluid identity and underscoring the enduring nature of human connection. They act as vessels for unspoken thoughts and feelings, offering the characters a means to bridge physical and temporal distances, thus deepening the audience’s understanding of their relationships.

As a narrative tool, letters contribute to the film's thematic and structural coherence. They drive the plot by marking key moments of emotional and chronological transition, such as the heartbreak with Sasha or the newfound companionship with Shelmerdine. Visually and sonically, the film uses letters creatively—voiceovers of their contents are layered with imagery, creating a dynamic interplay between text and visuals that enhances the storytelling. Furthermore, the letters reflect the passage of time through changing language styles and societal norms, emphasizing the fluidity of identity and history that defines Orlando's journey. This dual function makes letters integral to the film's exploration of connection, transformation, and self-awareness.

2) Discuss some of the views regarding marriage, relationship and the role of society presented by the various characters in the film.

In Sally Potter’s 'Orlando', the characters express a range of views on marriage, relationships, and societal roles, reflecting the evolving norms and cultural expectations across the centuries. Orlando, the protagonist, provides a nuanced perspective on these themes. Initially, as a young nobleman, Orlando views love and marriage through the lens of societal expectations, pursuing Sasha with romantic fervor. However, Sasha's betrayal leads Orlando to question the permanence and sincerity of relationships. Later, as a woman, Orlando experiences the restrictive gender roles imposed by society, particularly the expectation to marry for stability and social acceptance, rather than love or personal fulfillment. This shift highlights the double standards inherent in societal constructs of marriage and relationships.  

Shelmerdine, Orlando’s final romantic partner, introduces a more progressive view of relationships. Their connection is marked by mutual respect and an absence of traditional power dynamics, offering a stark contrast to earlier depictions of relationships in the film. Unlike the transactional nature of marriage seen in Orlando's earlier experiences, their bond symbolizes a partnership based on equality and shared understanding. Through these interactions, the film critiques the societal imposition of rigid gender roles and the institution of marriage as a tool of social control, ultimately advocating for personal authenticity and freedom in relationships.

3) In your opinion, is the film able to capture Woolf's depressive state with sincerity & genuity?

Sally Potter’s 'Orlando' does not explicitly aim to capture Virginia Woolf’s depressive state but rather focuses on translating the novel’s themes of fluidity, identity, and time into a visual medium. However, the film’s tone and style subtly reflect Woolf’s existential concerns, which are deeply tied to her struggles with mental health. The narrative's exploration of the constraints of gender, societal expectations, and mortality can be seen as metaphors for Woolf’s own feelings of alienation and inner turmoil.

The film conveys a sense of melancholy and introspection through its deliberate pacing, Orlando’s reflective moments, and the evocative use of music and imagery. While it does not directly depict Woolf’s depressive state, the film’s nuanced exploration of emotional vulnerability and resilience resonates with the deeper psychological undertones present in her works. In this way, 'Orlando' captures the spirit of Woolf’s introspective and philosophical outlook with sincerity, even if it does not explicitly focus on her mental health struggles.

4) Share your thoughts about the portrayal of the relationship between Virginia Woolf and Vita Sackville West. (Here, discuss points like who initiated the relationship, their first meeting, their last meeting, etc)

The relationship between Virginia Woolf and Vita Sackville-West, one of the most fascinating and influential literary liaisons of the 20th century, is often viewed as a complex interplay of love, creativity, and mutual admiration. Though not explicitly portrayed in 'Orlando', the novel itself serves as a deeply personal homage to their bond. Here’s a discussion of their relationship:

Initiation and First Meeting

Vita Sackville-West, a confident and aristocratic poet and novelist, initiated the relationship with Virginia Woolf. They first met in 1922 at a dinner party hosted by Clive Bell, Woolf's brother-in-law. Initially, Virginia found Vita somewhat frivolous, but as they began corresponding and meeting more frequently, Woolf was drawn to Vita's charm, vitality, and unorthodox lifestyle. Vita, on the other hand, admired Virginia’s intellect and literary genius. Their relationship evolved into a deep friendship and romantic connection by 1925.

Their Romantic and Creative Bond

The relationship, while romantic, was never conventional. Vita’s more extroverted, adventurous personality contrasted with Virginia’s introspective and sensitive nature. Despite this, their bond was intellectually enriching, with Vita serving as a muse for Virginia. Woolf’s 'Orlando' (1928) is a literary tribute to Vita, blending fantasy and biography to immortalize her gender-fluid, boundary-defying persona.

Challenges and Last Meeting

Their relationship faced challenges due to Vita's ongoing affairs, including her open marriage to Harold Nicolson, and Virginia's mental health struggles. While their romantic involvement lessened over time, their friendship endured. Their last significant meeting occurred in the late 1930s, before Virginia’s tragic death in 1941. Even then, their correspondence reflected affection and mutual respect.

Legacy

The relationship profoundly impacted both women’s lives and works. For Virginia, Vita represented freedom, creativity, and inspiration, while Virginia offered Vita intellectual depth and artistic validation. Their bond challenged societal norms, explored fluid identities, and enriched the literary canon, leaving a legacy that resonates deeply within feminist and queer literary studies.

 

I.A. Richards Figurative Language (Practical Criticism)

 This blog is a part of the study activity(I.A. Richards Figurative Language (Practical Criticism)) provided by the head of the Department of English (MKBU), Prof. and Dr. Dilip Barad Sir. Here is the link to the research articlehere.

1. 'Ek evu ATM hoi'  by-Harshdev Madhv

Introduction :

The poem 'એક એવું એ.ટી.એમ. હોય!' creatively explores the intersection of materialism and emotional fulfillment in modern life. Using the metaphor of an ATM, the poet critiques the transactional nature of contemporary relationships and human values. Through this imaginative premise, the poem raises questions about society's overreliance on technology and instant gratification, juxtaposing the pursuit of wealth with the need for emotional well-being. With its relatable imagery and satirical tone, the poem resonates deeply with the struggles of a fast-paced, urban lifestyle, offering a poignant reflection on the human condition.

Metaphor and Symbolism

ATM as a Symbol: The ATM symbolizes a repository of emotions, relationships, and human values. Instead of cash withdrawals, the poet envisions withdrawals of "happiness" or "solutions" to life's challenges.

Deposit and Withdrawal: The "deposit" of sorrows and "withdrawal" of joys reflect a transactional view of emotions, underscoring the mechanical and detached way people often approach relationships.

Fast Cash and Credit: Terms like “Fast Cash” and “Credit” highlight how instant gratification governs modern life, often at the expense of deeper, meaningful experiences.

Modern Life Critique

The poet critiques the materialistic and transactional nature of contemporary life. People often expect quick fixes to complex emotional problems, similar to withdrawing money from an ATM. This reflects the impatience and superficiality of modern relationships and social interactions.

Structural Analysis

The poem’s free verse style aligns with its conversational and relatable tone. The informal language, combined with familiar terms like "Fast Cash," "Debit Card," and "Auto Tip," creates an accessible narrative for readers to connect with.

The imagery is vivid and modern, painting a picture of bustling urban life filled with stress, deadlines, and fleeting moments of joy.

Emotional Undertones

The poem conveys a subtle sense of longing and frustration. The speaker seems overwhelmed by the emotional void in daily life and envisions a fantastical ATM that can bridge this gap. There is a mix of sarcasm, hope, and criticism, making the poem multi-layered and thought-provoking.

Social Commentary

The poem reflects on the loss of emotional intimacy in a fast-paced, technology-driven world. It questions whether technology can ever truly address human needs beyond the material realm. The “ATM” here becomes a satirical metaphor for society’s reliance on quick fixes rather than building lasting relationships or solving deeper issues.

Themes:

Materialistic Aspirations:

The poem humorously imagines an ATM-like entity that dispenses not just money but solutions to life's desires, symbolizing society's obsession with instant gratification.

Convenience and Dependency:

It critiques modern-day dependence on technology and systems that provide instant results, often at the cost of personal effort or authenticity.

Irony of Modern Life:

The poet uses irony to highlight how society wishes for effortless resolutions, from happiness to luxuries, much like withdrawing cash from an ATM.

Conclusion:

The poet humorously yet critically examines society’s dependence on external systems for fulfillment. It serves as a reminder of the need to seek authentic and self-driven solutions rather than relying solely on material or technological aids.

Misunderstood point :

1. Last 3 line 
2. ભીંજાવું એટલું જો કરીએ ડિમાન્ડ
3. સ્ટેમેન્ટ માગતાં જ સ્મરણોની ટ્રાન્સફર

2. TV Serial jevi chahat nu geet

The poem "ટીવી સિરિયલની જેવી ચાલતું ગીત" seems to critique modern societal and cultural dynamics by comparing life or experiences to the melodramatic nature of TV serials. Here's an analysis based on its themes, tone, and style:

Themes

1. Artificiality and Superficiality: 

The poet draws parallels between life and TV serials, highlighting how superficiality dominates our expressions and interactions.

   - References to changing "stories" and creating "fake emotions" point to the manufactured and scripted nature of modern behavior.

   

2. Consumer Culture and Media Influence: 

   - Lines about dialogues, staging, and the role of "camera" emphasize the performative aspect of modern existence, influenced by media and commercialization.

3. Loss of Authenticity: 

   - The poem laments the erosion of genuine feelings and spontaneity, replaced by scripted responses and artificial charm.

   

4. Globalization and Identity Crisis: 

   - Mentions of (distress signals) and blending Western and local influences suggest a critique of cultural homogenization, where traditional values are diluted.

5. Reflection on Progress: 

   - The concluding lines ponder whether the modern race for progress, symbolized by technological advancements, truly leads to fulfillment or alienation.

Tone:

- Critical and Reflective: The poem adopts a critical perspective on contemporary life, questioning its substance and direction.

- Satirical: The comparison to TV serials adds an ironic edge, subtly mocking how life has become a staged performance.

Style and Structure

- Conversational Style: The use of direct language and everyday references makes the poem relatable.

- Imagery and Symbolism: Terms like "camera," "dialogues," and "episodes" symbolize modernity's staged and fragmented nature.

- Cultural References: The poem balances local and global elements, emphasizing a clash between tradition and modernity.

- Rhyme and Rhythm: The rhythm mirrors the repetitive, predictable nature of TV serials, reinforcing the poem's theme.

Message:

The poem critiques how modern life, driven by media, globalization, and artificiality, mirrors the scripted, superficial, and often meaningless progression of TV serials. It calls for introspection on authenticity, identity, and the true essence of human existence.

Evaluation

In I. A. Richards' framework, the poem succeeds in:

Eliciting Emotional Responses: It effectively balances satire with genuine concern, making the reader reflect on their own life.

Creating Effective Imagery: The vivid metaphors bridge the gap between artifice and reality.

Achieving Unity: The poem's theme, tone, and imagery align cohesively, amplifying its critique.

However, one might critique the poem for its overt reliance on comparison to TV serials, which could alienate readers unfamiliar with their tropes.

Questions :

1. Is the poet merely critiquing modernity, or is there an underlying hope for change?
2. How does the poem challenge the reader to reconsider their role in perpetuating artificiality in life?  
3. How does the poem balance local and global cultural influences in its imagery and themes?  

References:

•  Barad, Dilip. “I.A. Richards: The Figurative Language | Practical Criticism.” ResearchGate, Jan. 2024,https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23687.98724
• Richards, Ivor Armstrong. Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgment. Harper Perennial, 1956.

T.S. Eliot - Criticism: Tradition and Individual Talent

 This blog is a part of the study activity(Bridge Course) provided by the head of the Department of English (MKBU), Prof. and Dr. Dilip Barad Sir. Here is the link to the research article:here.

The discusses T.S. Eliot in three segments, focusing on his contemporaries, his works, and his persona. It highlights how his poetry and intellectual contributions influenced 20th-century literature and thought. You can access the full discussion in the video for a more detailed exploration.

1. How would you like to explain Eliot's concept of 'Tradition'? Do you agree with it? What do you understand by 'Historical Sense'? (Use these quotes to explain your understanding.)

T.S. Eliot's concept of "tradition," as outlined in his essay Tradition and the Individual Talent, represents a profound and dynamic relationship between the past and the present. Eliot argues that tradition is not merely a collection of inherited customs or artifacts but an active, living process through which a writer engages with the accumulated achievements of literary history.

Eliot's Concept of Tradition:

For Eliot, tradition is both a burden and a privilege. It demands that a writer have a deep knowledge of the past and use this understanding to inform their own work. However, tradition does not imply blind imitation; instead, it requires a critical engagement with literary predecessors, allowing the writer to contribute something original while simultaneously reshaping the tradition.

Eliot famously states:

"The historical sense involves a perception, not only of the pastness of the past but of its presence."

This means that tradition is not static but dynamic. The past, while distinct and separate from the present, continues to exert an influence, shaping the creative consciousness of the present. A true poet, therefore, must write with a dual awareness of the past's timeless achievements and the present's contemporary concerns.

Historical Sense:

Eliot’s "historical sense" involves recognizing this duality:

"A sense of the timeless as well as of the temporal, and of the timeless and of the temporal together."

This suggests that a writer must balance two perspectives: the enduring universality of artistic forms and values ("timeless") and the specific cultural, social, and historical context in which they write ("temporal"). The historical sense is thus an imaginative faculty that allows writers to position themselves within a continuum of tradition, understanding their work as part of a larger cultural conversation.

Agreement with Eliot:

I partially agree with Eliot's concept of tradition and the historical sense. His insistence on engaging with the past encourages a depth of understanding and a sense of responsibility in writers, ensuring that art does not become entirely untethered from its cultural roots. However, the concept can also seem overly prescriptive, potentially limiting experimental or radically innovative artistic endeavors that might challenge or even reject the canon.

For instance, modernist and postmodernist movements have demonstrated that breaking away from tradition can also yield significant cultural contributions. Eliot's framework may not adequately account for the value of these forms of artistic rebellion.

My Understanding:

Eliot’s views underscore that art is not created in isolation. Writers are part of an evolving tradition, and their works are enriched by an awareness of the past. At the same time, they must remain responsive to the demands and sensibilities of their own era.

This interplay of timelessness and temporality resonates particularly in literary criticism, where understanding the historical context of a text enhances its interpretation, but acknowledging its contemporary relevance is equally important. Eliot's "historical sense" invites a balanced view of tradition—not as a rigid framework but as a fertile ground for new creativity.

2.What is the relationship between “tradition” and "individual talent,” according to the poet T. S. Eliot? 

In his essay Tradition and the Individual Talent, T.S. Eliot explores the complex relationship between “tradition” and “individual talent,” presenting them not as oppositional forces but as interconnected and mutually enriching aspects of literary creation.

Tradition:

Eliot views tradition as the accumulated body of literary works from the past that have stood the test of time. Tradition is not merely an unthinking adherence to old forms or themes; rather, it involves a dynamic interaction with the literary achievements of predecessors. He writes that tradition requires:

"A perception, not only of the pastness of the past but of its presence."

This means that the works of the past remain alive and relevant in the present, shaping the creative consciousness of contemporary writers. For Eliot, engaging with tradition is essential because it places the writer within a broader cultural and historical continuum.

Individual Talent:

While tradition is collective, individual talent is the personal, creative contribution of a writer to this continuum. According to Eliot, true originality does not arise from a complete break with the past; instead, it emerges when a writer adds something unique to the tradition. Individual talent refines and reshapes tradition by introducing fresh perspectives or forms.

However, Eliot insists that this individuality must be achieved through discipline and self-sacrifice. He argues that the poet must suppress their personal emotions and experiences to create something universal, stating:

"Poetry is not a turning loose of emotion, but an escape from emotion; it is not the expression of personality, but an escape from personality."

Their Interrelationship:

Eliot asserts that tradition and individual talent are interdependent. A writer cannot develop a significant individual talent without understanding and contributing to tradition. Conversely, tradition is not static; it evolves through the works of individual talents who reinterpret and expand its scope. He states:

"The existing monuments form an ideal order among themselves, which is modified by the introduction of the new (the really new) work of art among them."

In this sense, every new work of genius redefines and repositions the entire body of tradition. The past influences the present, but the present also alters the perception of the past, creating a dynamic and reciprocal relationship.

Critique and Personal View:

Eliot's concept is compelling in its recognition of the writer's role within a larger cultural framework. It emphasizes humility and intellectual rigor, discouraging self-indulgent individualism. However, it may undervalue the significance of radical departures from tradition, such as those seen in avant-garde movements or non-Western literary traditions, which often challenge established canons rather than contributing to them.

In summary, Eliot’s relationship between tradition and individual talent underscores that great art arises from the fusion of personal creativity with a profound engagement with the cultural and literary heritage. It is through this balance that a writer achieves both originality and enduring significance.

3. Explain: "Some can absorb knowledge; the more tardy must sweat for it. Shakespeare acquired more essential history from Plutarch than most men could from the whole British Museum".

This sentence underscores Shakespeare’s extraordinary intellectual ability and his exceptional talent for transforming knowledge into creative brilliance. Unlike his contemporaries, Shakespeare cultivated the skill of deep and meaningful reading, enabling him to extract profound insights from sources like Plutarch's Lives, which provided him with essential knowledge of Greek history and literature. He demonstrated a unique capacity to synthesize knowledge from diverse fields and apply it innovatively in his works. His absorbing quality allowed him to grasp the essence of his material and adapt it with originality, setting him apart from others of his time who lacked this skill. This ability not only highlights his individual genius but also explains his lasting success and his enduring relevance across generations.

4. Explain: "Honest criticism and sensitive appreciation are directed not upon the poet but upon the poetry." 

This statement, drawn from T.S. Eliot's essay "Tradition and the Individual Talent," emphasizes the importance of focusing on the work itself rather than the personal life or character of the poet. Eliot argues that true literary criticism should evaluate the poetry's form, meaning, and artistic merit rather than the poet's emotions, biography, or intentions. 

By separating the poet from the poetry, this approach champions objectivity in literary analysis. The poem becomes an independent entity, judged on how effectively it conveys universal truths, emotions, or ideas rather than as a reflection of the poet's personality. This perspective challenges the Romantic idea that poetry is a direct expression of the poet's soul, advocating instead for an impersonal approach where the work stands on its own. In essence, Eliot is calling for a shift from personal to textual criticism, ensuring that the value of poetry is determined by its intrinsic qualities, not by extrinsic associations with its creator.

 

5. How would you like to explain Eliot's theory of depersonalization? You can explain this with the help of a chemical reaction in the presence of a catalyst agent, platinum.

T.S. Eliot’s theory of depersonalization, explained in his essay "Tradition and the Individual Talent," compares the creative process of poetry to a chemical reaction involving a catalyst. In this analogy, the poet’s mind acts as the catalyst (like platinum in a chemical reaction) that facilitates the combination of emotions, ideas, and experiences into a new poetic creation. Just as platinum enables oxygen and sulfur dioxide to form sulfur trioxide without being altered itself, the poet’s personal feelings and identity are not directly reflected in the work. Instead, the poetry becomes an independent, impersonal entity.

Eliot emphasizes that great poetry arises not from the poet’s personal emotions but from their ability to detach from them and craft a work of universal significance. This process of depersonalization ensures that the resulting art transcends the poet's ego, focusing instead on technical skill and the integration of tradition and universal truths. In this way, Eliot argues that poetry achieves timelessness by existing as a product of craft and creativity rather than personal expression. 

6.Explain: "Poetry is not a turning loose of emotion but an escape from emotion; it is not the expression of personality but an escape from personality." Write two points on which one can write a critique of 'T.S. Eliot as a critic.'.

T.S. Eliot’s theory of impersonal poetry, where emotion is not freely expressed but "escaped" from, has been critiqued for minimizing the importance of personal expression in art. By advocating for poetry that transcends the poet's individual emotions and personality, Eliot limits the authenticity and emotional depth that personal experience can bring to a poem. Critics argue that such a stance overlooks the profound connection between a poet’s unique emotional experience and the impact it has on readers, reducing poetry to a formal, detached exercise rather than a genuine, human expression.

Additionally, Eliot's insistence on the technical and impersonal aspects of poetry has been critiqued for narrowing the scope of artistic expression. This perspective excludes the value of spontaneous, personal creativity, as seen in the works of Romantic poets who emphasized individual emotion and subjectivity. Critics argue that Eliot’s view undervalues the role of the poet’s personality in creating resonant and relatable art, offering a more restrictive framework that may diminish the full spectrum of artistic expression.

Modern Times and The Great Dictator

This blog is a part of the study activity provided by the head of the Department of English (MKBU), Prof. and Dr. Dilip Barad Sir. Here is the link to the research article:here.

Year :1936

Cast :Charles Chaplin, Paulette Goddard, Henry Bergman, Stanley J. Sandford, Chester Conklin, Hank Mann, Louis Natheaux, Stanley Blystone, Edward LeSaint, Allan Garcia, Sam Stein, Juana Sutton, Murdoch McQuarrie, Jack Low, Walter James, Mira McKinney...

Production :United Artists

Subjected to the infernal production rate of the factory, a model worker suddenly has a nervous breakdown and goes mad. From hospital, to prison, to unemployment, the Little Tramp gets caught up in the sprockets and cogs of modern industrialization. That is, until he comes across a beautiful orphaned gamine, whom he helps escape from the police. How to break free from the constraints of modern life? Chaplin provides a critical look at productivity in the early 20th century

In Scene 1 of Modern Times, Chaplin’s character is introduced on the factory assembly line. He is part of the machine-like process, tightening bolts at a rapid pace. This scene immediately sets the tone for the film, showing the dehumanizing nature of factory work. Chaplin’s exaggerated actions and comic timing highlight the absurdity of the system, where humans become like the machines they operate. The fast pace and repetitive actions emphasize the strain on individual workers under capitalism.

Chaplin introduces one of the film's key themes: the absurdity of technological progress. This scene features the testing of a feeding machine meant to increase efficiency by allowing workers to eat without stopping their tasks. However, the machine malfunctions hilariously, causing chaos and discomfort for Chaplin's character. This sequence satirizes the obsession with productivity and the disregard for human dignity in the pursuit of industrial efficiency

encounters a group of people in a comedic misunderstanding involving food or social mishaps. This scene aligns with Chaplin’s style, combining slapstick humor and satirical commentary on societal norms or class distinctions.

In 'Modern Times', the sequence where the Tramp and the Gamin move into a rundown house captures their dream of a better life despite their dire circumstances. The house is comically dilapidated, with a leaky roof, unstable furniture, and a general sense of disrepair. Chaplin uses physical comedy, such as balancing precarious furniture, to highlight the couple’s struggle while showcasing their optimism and resilience. The scene serves as a metaphor for finding joy and hope even in the face of adversity.

Tramp and the Gamin attempt to adapt to life in a new rural setting. The cow becomes part of their comical efforts to survive and sustain themselves, showcasing their resourcefulness and resilience. This scene contrasts the harsh industrial world with the simplicity of rural life while maintaining Chaplin’s signature mix of slapstick humor and poignant social commentary. L

The factory reopening scene in Modern Times signifies a brief return to employment for the Tramp, who is hired back at the same industrial plant. Despite the promise of stability, the scene quickly devolves into chaos as the Tramp struggles to adapt to the factory's fast-paced, machine-driven workflow. This sequence underscores the repetitive and unforgiving nature of industrial labor while maintaining Chaplin's trademark humor. The scene is a critique of the lack of regard for workers' well-being in industrial systems

The final scene of Modern Times is one of the most iconic moments in cinema history. The Tramp and the Gamin, after facing numerous struggles, walk hand in hand along a deserted road toward an uncertain future. Despite their hardships, they share a sense of hope and resilience, symbolized by their smiles and the optimistic score. This poignant ending reflects Chaplin's belief in the enduring strength of the human spirit amidst the challenges of modern life.

Movie :Here

The Great Dictator :

The Great Dictator, American comedy film, released in 1940, that Charlie Chaplin both acted in and directed. Satirizing Adolf Hitler and Nazism and condemning anti-Semitism, it was Chaplin’s most successful film at the box office.

Chaplin portrayed a Jewish barber who is mistaken for a tyrannical dictator. He plays up the charade and ultimately gives a speech in which he calls for peace and compassion. Chaplin, in a dual role, also played the fascist dictator, modeled after Hitler

The Great Dictator, Chaplin parodies war and military bureaucracy during World War I. The Jewish barber, a soldier, fumbles his way through chaotic combat scenes, highlighting the absurdity of war. The slapstick humor contrasts with the darker realities of conflict, establishing the film’s satirical tone. The scene introduces Chaplin's critique of blind nationalism and militarism while setting up the barber's character as an everyman caught in the turmoil of historical forces

The barber’s innocence and humanity stand in stark contrast to Hynkel’s tyranny. After losing his memory during World War I, the barber returns to his ghetto, where he faces systemic oppression. Through his actions, Chaplin highlights themes of resilience, identity, and the struggle against fascism. The barber's eventual impersonation of Hynkel leads to the iconic closing speech advocating for peace and equality

Adenoid Hynkel’s comically exaggerated address, parodying Adolf Hitler’s style and mannerisms. Chaplin delivers gibberish sprinkled with recognizable German-sounding words, gesticulating wildly and embodying the caricature of a tyrannical dictator. The speech mocks the bombast and theatricality of authoritarian leaders, highlighting the absurdity of their rhetoric. Through this satire, Chaplin critiques the destructive power of propaganda and blind nationalism. 

This scene comically exaggerates the dictator's egotism and delusions of grandeur, particularly through his interactions with subordinates and his infamous "ballet with the globe" sequence, where he dances with a balloon shaped like Earth. This moment critiques the dangerous ambitions of fascist leaders, blending humor with a chilling reminder of the destructive consequences of unchecked power.

This moment is part of the comedic chaos where he accidentally gets involved with a political figure or authority. 

The last speech in The Great Dictator is one of the most iconic moments in film history. Delivered by the barber impersonating Hynkel, it shifts from satire to sincere advocacy for peace and human unity. The speech rejects dictatorship and greed, promoting democracy, compassion, and the power of humanity to overcome tyranny. Chaplin directly appeals to the audience, addressing the horrors of war and urging hope for a better future. This plea for universal brotherhood remains deeply relevant.

Conclusion:

 'The Great Dictator' is a powerful speech delivered by the barber, who has been mistaken for the dictator Adenoid Hynkel. In this speech, he calls for peace, freedom, and humanity, urging people to reject dictatorships, oppression, and hatred. He emphasizes the importance of kindness, compassion, and unity, appealing to the common good of mankind and the power of democracy. The film ends with this hopeful message, urging individuals to work together for a better future.

Movie:Here.

War Poetry

This blog is a part of the study activity provided by Prakruti Ma'am.

Q:1 Choose one poem from the English literary cannon which deals with the theme of war and compare it with any one of the five war poems you have studied in this unit. [Discuss aspects like the style of the poems, language employed, treatment of the theme of war, etc.] How are they different? Are there any similarities?

Ans:

Comparative Analysis: "The Charge of the Light Brigade" by Alfred Lord Tennyson vs. "Dulce et Decorum Est" by Wilfred Owen.

War poetry captures the experiences, emotions, and reflections of those who witness or endure the realities of war. While some poems glorify war, emphasizing themes of honor and patriotism, others expose its brutalities and futility. Alfred Lord Tennyson’s 'The Charge of the Light Brigade' and Wilfred Owen’s 'Dulce et Decorum Est' exemplify these contrasting perspectives. Tennyson celebrates the courage and sacrifice of soldiers during a doomed mission, reflecting Victorian ideals of heroism, while Owen critiques the romanticized notion of war, portraying its harrowing realities from a soldier’s perspective during World War I. Comparing these poems highlights the evolution of attitudes toward war in literature.

Comparative Summary:

Both poems address the theme of war but reflect different historical contexts and public attitudes:

Tennyson’s Poem (1854): 

Written shortly after the Battle of Balaclava, it mirrors Victorian society’s emphasis on patriotic heroism and unquestioning obedience. The public, inspired by stories of valor, was moved by Tennyson’s celebration of duty and sacrifice.

Owen’s Poem (1920): 

Published after World War I, it reflects the disillusionment of a generation that experienced the unprecedented horrors of trench warfare. Owen’s work challenges earlier romanticized portrayals of war, aligning with a public increasingly critical of the costs and motives of conflict.

Together, these works highlight how public narratives and perceptions of war evolved between the mid-19th and early 20th centuries.

 Style of the Poems  

Tennyson’s Style:

  Written in dactylic dimeter, 'The Charge of the Light Brigade' has a rhythmic, galloping cadence that mirrors the movement of cavalry. Its structured stanzas and refrain (“Rode the six hundred”) create a sense of unity and momentum, emphasizing the collective heroism of the soldiers.  

Owen’s Style:

'Dulce et Decorum Est' employs irregular stanza lengths and enjambment to reflect the chaos and unpredictability of war. The fragmented structure mirrors the disorientation and trauma experienced by soldiers, creating an unpolished yet intensely realistic effect.  

Language Employed  

Tennyson:

  Tennyson uses elevated, formal diction to create a heroic tone. Phrases like “valley of Death” and “noble six hundred” invoke epic imagery, portraying the soldiers as martyrs of duty. The language is deliberately abstract, focusing on collective valor rather than individual suffering.  

Owen: 

  Owen employs visceral, graphic imagery to depict the physical and emotional toll of war. Descriptions such as “bent double, like old beggars” and “froth-corrupted lungs” are stark and unsettling. His language is direct and confrontational, aiming to shock the reader into recognizing the grim realities of warfare.  

 Treatment of the Theme of War  

Tennyson:

  The poem celebrates war as a noble endeavor, emphasizing duty and sacrifice over the personal cost of conflict. Tennyson does not question the rationale behind the disastrous charge but instead immortalizes the soldiers’ unquestioning obedience. The theme of honor overshadows the futility of the mission.  

Owen: 

  In contrast, Owen critiques the romanticized notion of war. His poem highlights the dehumanizing effects of battle and condemns the propaganda that glorifies dying for one’s country. The final lines"The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est / Pro patria mori"*reject the traditional glorification of war, presenting it as a betrayal of the young soldiers.  

Historical Context:

Tennyson: Reflects the Victorian era’s emphasis on patriotism and heroism. The poem aligns with public sentiment, idealizing the role of the soldier.

Owen: Reflects the disillusionment of the post-WWI era, contrasting sharply with earlier, romanticized depictions of war. Owen critiques propaganda that misled young men into enlisting.

 Similarities: 

- Both poems acknowledge the courage of soldiers:  

  - Tennyson praises their bravery in charging into certain death.  

  - Owen, while critical of war, does not diminish the endurance and suffering of the soldiers.  

- Both poems use vivid imagery to engage the reader:  

  - Tennyson’s imagery focuses on grandeur and heroism.  

  - Owen’s imagery highlights suffering and grotesque realities.  

 Differences:

Perspective:

Tennyson glorifies war from an observer’s viewpoint, while Owen critiques it from a soldier’s firsthand experience.

Tone:

Tennyson is patriotic; Owen is bitter and anti-war.

Language:

Tennyson uses formal, heroic diction; Owen uses raw, shocking language

 Conclusion:

Tennyson’s 'The Charge of the Light Brigade' and Owen’s 'Dulce et Decorum Est' offer two contrasting perspectives on war. While Tennyson immortalizes the nobility of soldiers' sacrifice, Owen dismantles the glorified image of war, exposing its grim realities. These differences reflect the evolving attitudes towards war in different historical contexts—Victorian heroism versus post-World War I disillusionment. Both poems, however, succeed in leaving an indelible impression on readers, underscoring the complex and multifaceted nature of war.

Q:2)"War poetry is not necessarily ‘anti-war’. It is, however, about the very large questions of life: identity, innocence, guilt, loyalty, courage, compassion, humanity, duty, desire, death." Discuss this statement in the context of any two of the war poems you have studied.

The statement highlights that war poetry is not always purely anti-war but often delves into the profound and complex themes that emerge from the human experience in the context of war. Through the exploration of identity, guilt, duty, and other emotions, war poetry can offer a multifaceted perspective on conflict, where the focus is as much on human nature and societal values as it is on the war itself. Let’s consider two well-known war poems to discuss this statement further: Wilfred Owen’s "Dulce et Decorum Est" and Rupert Brooke’s "The Soldier".

1. Wilfred Owen's "Dulce et Decorum Est":

Owen’s poem is one of the most famous works of World War I poetry and directly challenges the glorification of war. Its central theme is the contrast between the romanticized idea of war and the brutal reality of it. Through vivid and harrowing imagery, Owen portrays soldiers as physically and mentally broken by the horrors of the battlefield. The famous closing lines, "My friend, you would not tell with such high zest / To children ardent for some desperate glory, / The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est / Pro patria mori", directly criticize the phrase "Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori" ("It is sweet and fitting to die for one's country"), a sentiment commonly invoked to encourage young men to enlist. 

Rather than being simply anti-war, the poem explores themes such as identity (how war strips soldiers of their humanity), guilt (the sense of helplessness and failure in the face of death), loyalty (the sense of duty towards comrades), and death (the horrifying reality of a soldier’s death). The poem presents these themes in such stark and vivid terms that it forces the reader to reconsider the often-glorified image of war.

 2. Rupert Brooke's "The Soldier"

In contrast, Rupert Brooke’s "The Soldier" presents a more idealized and patriotic view of war. Written early in World War I, the poem reflects the prevailing attitudes of British society at the time, wherein soldiers were seen as noble and self-sacrificing. Brooke’s speaker imagines the body of a fallen soldier being buried in a foreign land, where it becomes part of the earth, and thereby perpetuates England’s legacy. Lines like, "If I should die, think only this of me: / That there's some corner of a foreign field / That is forever England." speak to the themes of duty and loyalty, as the soldier believes his sacrifice serves a greater, patriotic cause.

While "The Soldier" can be viewed as a celebration of military sacrifice, it still touches on the theme of identity, albeit in a more romanticized manner. The speaker finds meaning in his death by associating it with national identity and an enduring legacy. Yet, the idealization of war in this poem contrasts sharply with the raw, realistic depictions of war in Owen's "Dulce et Decorum Est", showing the tension between different ways war is perceived.

 Conclusion:

Both poems offer distinct perspectives on war but resonate with the themes of identity, death, duty, and loyalty. Owen’s "Dulce et Decorum Est" critiques the glorification of war, showing how soldiers lose their sense of identity and are subjected to death and guilt, while Brooke’s "The Soldier" presents war as a noble sacrifice that strengthens one's connection to their homeland. Both poets engage with the larger questions of humanity that war inevitably forces individuals to confront—making war poetry not just a commentary on war itself, but on life, death, and the human condition in times of extreme stress.

Q:3)Compare Ivor Gurney's The Target with Wilfred Owen's Dulce et Decorum Est. What are some notable similarities and differences between these two war poets and their poetry?

Ivor Gurney's 'The Target' and Wilfred Owen's 'Dulce et Decorum Est' are both poignant depictions of the horrors of war, but they approach the subject matter from different perspectives and use distinct techniques. Here's a comparison of the two works:

Similarities:

1. 'Anti-War Sentiment': 

Both poems reject the glorification of war and emphasize its brutal, dehumanizing nature. Owen's 'Dulce et Decorum Est' exposes the devastating impact of war on soldiers, undermining the patriotic notion that it is "sweet and fitting" to die for one's country. Gurney's 'The Target' similarly critiques the idea of heroism and valor in war, showing the psychological and physical trauma experienced by soldiers.

   

2. 'Vivid Imagery and Realism': 

Both poets use graphic imagery to convey the horrors of war. Owen's poem describes a gas attack, with haunting images of a soldier choking to death. Gurney, in 'The Target', portrays the sense of being hunted by the enemy, using vivid descriptions of the battlefield that evoke the terror soldiers feel when they are in constant danger.

3. Focus on the Soldier's Experience: 

Both poets focus on the individual soldier's experience rather than grand political or national concerns. The poems convey the personal trauma, suffering, and disillusionment soldiers face during war.

 Differences:

1. Tone and Perspective: 

Owen’s 'Dulce et Decorum Est' is a direct critique of the romanticized idea of war. His tone is one of anger and disillusionment, aimed at exposing the lie of wartime heroism. In contrast, Gurney’s 'The Target' adopts a more detached, almost fatalistic tone, focusing on the personal feeling of being hunted and targeted during combat.

2. Use of Language and Structure: 

Owen employs a more structured and formal approach to his poem, using a regular rhythm and rhyme scheme that emphasizes the solemnity of the subject. His use of the Latin phrase "Dulce et Decorum Est" at the end serves to underline the bitter irony of the poem. Gurney, by contrast, often employs a more fragmented and less predictable structure, which might reflect the chaotic and disorienting nature of war itself.

3. Emotional and Psychological Focus:

 While Owen’s poem is rooted in a visceral, physical reality, particularly with its horrifying depiction of a gas attack, Gurney’s 'The Target' is more concerned with the emotional and psychological impact of war. Gurney explores the mental anguish of being in a position where one is constantly at risk, showing a more introspective side to the soldier's experience.

Conclusion:

Both Gurney and Owen present war as a traumatic, dehumanizing experience, but their focus differs: Owen critiques the glorification of war with a direct, physical portrayal of its horrors, while Gurney delves more into the psychological toll of being a soldier, with an emphasis on the feeling of being a target. Both poets challenge the traditional narratives of heroism in war, though with varying tones and techniques.

Word of the Year - 2024 (Brain Rot and Manifest)

 This blog is a part of the study activity provided by the head of the Department of English (MKBU), Prof. and Dr. Dilip Barad Sir. Here is the link to the research article:Click here

The blog discusses the Words of the Year 2024: "Brain Rot" (Oxford) and "Manifest" (Cambridge). "Brain Rot" critiques overconsumption of poor-quality online content and its mental health implications, while "Manifest" reflects on the cultural trend of intention-setting without actionable planning. 

Manifest :

The word "Manifest" has deep historical, philosophical, and cultural significance, evolving over time in its meaning and usage. Here’s an in-depth look:  

1. Etymology and Original Meaning:

- The word comes from the Latin 'manifestus', meaning "clear, apparent, or evident."  

- It combines 'manus' (hand) and 'festus' (struck or touched), implying something tangible, within reach, or openly revealed.

To make visible or apparent; to bring something from obscurity into clarity or reality.  

2. Contemporary Definitions:

1. As an Adjective:  

   - Clear or obvious to the eye or mind.  

   - Example: "Her happiness was manifest in her glowing smile."  

2. As a Verb:  

   - To show, reveal, or display through one’s actions or appearance.  

   - Example: "He manifested courage in the face of adversity."  

   - To bring a dream, idea, or thought into reality, often through focused intention or effort.  

   - Example: "She manifested her goals through hard work and visualization."  

3. As a Noun:  

   - A document listing the contents of a shipment, cargo, or vehicle (e.g., shipping manifest).  

   - Example: "The cargo manifest detailed the items on board the ship."  

3. Cultural and Philosophical Context:

 

- The Self-Help Movement :  

   In recent years, "manifesting" has become synonymous with the idea of using positive thinking, affirmations, and visualizations to achieve desired outcomes. This ties into concepts like:  

   - The Law of Attraction: Belief that focusing on positive thoughts attracts positive outcomes.  

   - Mindfulness Practices: Encouraging clarity of purpose to align actions with goals.  

- Philosophy:  

   Philosophers have long discussed how humans "manifest" their will or essence through their actions, behaviors, and creations. For example:  

   - Jean-Paul Sartre's existentialism argues that individuals manifest their essence through choices and actions.  

4. Symbolic Interpretations

The word "manifest" often symbolizes clarity, purpose, and transformation. Its spiritual and symbolic connotations include:  

- Illumination: Making the hidden visible, like truth coming to light.  

- Empowerment: Realizing one’s potential by making abstract aspirations real.  

- Faith and Action: Combining belief in an outcome with the practical steps needed to achieve it.  

5. Applications of the Word:

- Personal Growth: Manifesting is widely used in coaching, where individuals are guided to "manifest" better futures through planning and intentionality.  

- Business and Documentation: "Manifest" as a noun is crucial in logistics, symbolizing the tangible representation of goods being transported.  

- Literature and Art: The term is used to describe works that "manifest" societal issues, emotions, or deeper truths.

6. Related Words and Synonyms:

- Adjective: Evident, obvious, apparent, clear.  

- Verb: Reveal, display, show, embody, materialize, actualize.  

- Noun: Declaration, list, inventory.  

 The word "Manifest" encompasses a powerful duality of meaning: it signifies both the process of making the invisible visible and the realization of intent or purpose. From its origins in Latin to its modern-day associations with personal growth and spirituality, the term captures humanity’s enduring desire to bring clarity, transformation, and tangible outcomes from abstract thoughts or hidden truths.

Whether applied in philosophy, literature, or everyday life, "manifest" reminds us of the importance of action, intention, and vision in shaping reality. It stands as a testament to the creative and transformative power of the human mind and will.

Brain Rot :

The phrase "Brain Rot" is a contemporary slang term that describes a mental state resulting from prolonged exposure to low-quality, mind-numbing, or overstimulating content, particularly in the digital age. It reflects the cultural critique of how modern habits, especially those involving excessive use of technology, can degrade intellectual and emotional well-being.

1. Meaning and Implications:

- Literal Interpretation: The phrase suggests mental decay or deterioration, akin to the rotting of organic matter. It metaphorically represents how the mind may weaken or lose sharpness due to overconsumption of trivial or harmful content.  

- Common Usage:  

   - Overindulgence in repetitive, unproductive, or sensationalist media (e.g., scrolling through social media, binge-watching, or engaging with clickbait).  

   - Experiencing a lack of focus, creativity, or motivation after exposure to overstimulating or monotonous digital environments.

2. Origins and Cultural Context:

- Historical Context: While "brain rot" is a recent term, its essence can be traced to longstanding concerns about the effects of mass media, entertainment, and technology on mental faculties.  

   - Plato criticized the dangers of unchecked entertainment on morality and intellect.

   - The term reflects modern anxieties about the overwhelming influence of digital distractions.  

- Digital Era: With the advent of smartphones, algorithms, and infinite scrolling, “brain rot” has become a symbolic critique of how technology fosters passive consumption over critical engagement.

3. Causes of Brain Rot:

- Overconsumption of Media: Endless exposure to memes, TikTok videos, clickbait articles, or poorly crafted content.  

- Sensory Overload: Rapid changes in information and visuals can overwhelm cognitive processing.  

- Algorithmic Traps: Platforms like YouTube or Instagram prioritize engagement over quality, leading users down repetitive or low-value content spirals.  

- Neglect of Mental Stimulation: A lack of meaningful intellectual activities, such as reading, critical thinking, or creative pursuits.

4. Symptoms and Effects: 

- Cognitive Symptoms:  

   - Difficulty concentrating or retaining information.  

   - Reduced critical thinking or problem-solving ability.  

   - Feelings of boredom despite constant stimulation.  

- Emotional Symptoms:  

   - A sense of emptiness, dissatisfaction, or frustration.  

   - Anxiety from overstimulation or comparison on social media.  

- Physical Symptoms:  

   - Eye strain and fatigue from prolonged screen use.

5. Philosophical and Psychological Critique:

- Mental Health Implications:  

   Brain rot highlights the mental toll of living in an information-rich but substance-poor environment. Overconsumption of digital media often replaces healthier habits like exercise, meaningful social interactions, or self-reflection.  

- Philosophical Concerns:  

   - In the spirit of Plato, critics argue that such distractions erode our capacity for deep thinking and virtue.  

   - From a postmodern perspective, "brain rot" illustrates how consumer culture turns individuals into passive recipients rather than active participants in their intellectual and creative lives.

6. Countering Brain Rot:

- Moderation: Limiting screen time and setting boundaries for social media usage.  

- Mindful Consumption: Prioritizing high-quality content and diverse learning opportunities over instant gratification.  

- Intellectual Engagemen: Reading books, practicing critical thinking, and engaging in meaningful conversations.  

Digital Detox: Taking breaks from technology to recharge mental faculties.  

Conclusion: 

"Brain Rot" serves as a stark reminder of the challenges posed by the digital age, where overstimulation and low-quality content threaten to dull our intellectual and emotional capacities. Addressing this issue requires conscious effort to reclaim focus, cultivate depth, and prioritize quality over quantity in our mental diets. By doing so, we can preserve our ability to think, create, and connect meaningfully in an increasingly distracted world.